An improvement exchange lets an investor use exchange funds to build or renovate the replacement property before taking title, but only the value actually completed by day 180 counts toward the like-kind requirement. This service plans the construction scope against that fixed deadline the way a general contractor plans a schedule against a hard completion date.
An exchange accommodation titleholder, arranged through the qualified intermediary, holds legal title to the replacement property while improvements are built with exchange proceeds, and the investor takes title only once the work is complete or the 180-day period ends, whichever comes first. Because the exchange period does not pause for construction, any improvement value not finished and in place by day 180 is not counted toward the replacement value the investor needed to defer the full gain.
That makes the construction schedule a load-bearing part of the exchange itself, not a separate project that happens to run alongside it.
Construction timelines in Park City run up against real constraints a flatland market does not have: winter access restrictions on Snyderville Basin and Wasatch Back sites, contractor demand that peaks around the resort season, and municipal or HOA design review that can add weeks an unadjusted schedule does not account for. A build-to-suit or renovation exchange planned around a Kimball Junction light-industrial parcel or an underimproved Main Street building needs a construction sequence with real contingency built in, not a best-case timeline copied from a warmer market.
Land purchased near Silver Creek or the Highway 40 corridor for ground-up improvement carries the added variable of utility and access work that has to be scheduled before the building itself can start.
Contractor availability tightens further in the months leading into ski season, when local crews are finishing resort-related projects on tight deadlines of their own, so a Park City improvement exchange competing for the same labor pool should assume longer lead times for bids and mobilization than a similar project might need elsewhere.
An exchange accommodation titleholder, arranged through the qualified intermediary, holds legal title while improvements are built, and the investor takes title once the work is finished or the 180-day period ends.
No. Only improvements actually completed and in place by day 180 count toward the replacement value needed to defer the full gain; work finished afterward does not retroactively count.
Access and construction activity on Snyderville Basin and Wasatch Back sites can slow considerably in winter months, and a schedule that does not account for that seasonal slowdown risks falling short of completed value by the deadline.
Generally no. The titleholder structure credits value that has actually been built into the property, not committed spend on materials still sitting uninstalled.
Building in contingency above the minimum required value is generally safer than budgeting to the exact figure, since delays or cost changes can otherwise leave the exchange short on day 180; the investor's advisor should review the budget before construction starts.
Each of these deliverables should be reviewed against the calendar monthly rather than only at the outset, since a schedule that looked achievable on day one can drift meaningfully by month four without regular checkpoints.
View All Service Areas