Nothing in a replacement property search or a closing schedule substitutes for the investor's own CPA reviewing the tax consequences of the exchange, and the coordination role here is to keep that advisor supplied with accurate transaction facts on a schedule that matches the exchange deadlines rather than lagging behind them. That schedule discipline is what keeps a tax question from surfacing after it can still be addressed, when the options for fixing it have already narrowed.
The advisor is typically looped in twice: once early, while the relinquished property is under contract and the exchange structure is being set up, and again as replacement candidates firm up, so basis and boot questions can be reviewed before the identification notice is filed rather than after closing when options have narrowed.
A CPA already familiar with the investor's broader tax situation, entity structure, or prior exchange history is looped in even earlier where possible, since that context shapes how a new exchange should be structured and helps the advisor answer questions faster once the transaction is moving.
Rather than a phone call summary, the advisor receives a written package with the transaction facts needed to answer basis and boot questions accurately. That package includes:
Where the investor holds the property through an LLC, partnership, or trust, ownership documents are included in that same package so the advisor can confirm entity-level eligibility questions without a separate request, which saves a full round of back-and-forth.
No, tax advice comes from the investor's own CPA or tax advisor; this role focuses on supplying accurate, timely transaction facts so the advisor can make that determination rather than working from incomplete information. That boundary is kept clear throughout the exchange.
Early, while the relinquished property is still under contract and the exchange structure is being set up, so basis and boot questions can be reviewed before the identification notice is filed rather than discovered afterward. That early engagement gives the advisor room to raise concerns while they can still be addressed.
Boot generally refers to a value or debt shortfall between the relinquished and replacement property that can create taxable gain; whether it applies and how much is a determination made by the investor's CPA based on the specific transaction facts, using figures supplied as part of the coordination package.
Transaction records are assembled and handed off well ahead of the filing deadline for the tax year the exchange closed in, since reconstructing closing statements and intermediary records after the fact takes considerably longer.
Check-ins are scheduled around the forty-five-day identification deadline and the one-hundred-eighty-day closing deadline rather than on a fixed calendar, since those are the points where a tax question could still change the transaction structure. An extra check-in is added if the investor's circumstances change mid-exchange, such as a new entity or a second concurrent transaction.
Whether a price or debt shortfall between the relinquished and replacement property creates boot, and how that affects the investor's basis carryover, is a tax determination made by the CPA, not part of the sourcing or coordination work. When a candidate's price is lower than the relinquished property's value, that gap is flagged to the advisor early rather than left for year-end filing to catch.
A rough estimate of any potential boot exposure is included in the flag itself, drawn from the purchase and sale figures, so the advisor has a starting point rather than a blank question and can respond with a specific answer rather than a general caution.
View All Service Areas