Form 8824 is where the exchange either gets reported correctly or becomes a source of avoidable back-and-forth with the CPA come filing season. This service assembles the underlying dates, descriptions, and figures from a Park City exchange into a package built for the tax preparer to use directly, without preparing or filing the return itself, and without offering any tax advice on how the numbers should ultimately be reported.
The form asks for the relinquished and replacement property descriptions, the date the relinquished property was transferred, the date the replacement property was received, realized gain, recognized gain if any boot was involved, and the carryover basis on the new property. Every one of those figures traces back to a closing statement, the QI's exchange summary, or the boot worksheet completed earlier in the transaction, which is why the package works best when it is assembled from documents gathered throughout the exchange rather than reconstructed after the fact.
The form also asks whether the exchange involved a related party, which is a separate reporting question from the property descriptions and dates; if any candidate on the identification list or the closing replacement was acquired from a related party, that fact should be flagged in the package rather than left for the CPA to discover independently.
An exchange built on a 200%-rule identification list with several smaller Park City replacement properties, or one that paired a direct acquisition with a DST allocation, typically needs multiple property descriptions and potentially multiple related worksheets feeding the same return rather than a single clean relinquished-to-replacement pair. Getting each property's dates and figures correctly separated matters more once more than one replacement asset is involved.
Remote ownership is common among Park City investors, and CPAs working from out of state benefit from a package that is already organized by property and by date rather than a folder of unlabeled closing PDFs.
An improvement exchange adds one more layer, since the reported replacement value has to reflect only the construction work actually completed by day 180, not the full budgeted scope of the project. That distinction should be documented clearly in the package so the preparer is not left guessing which figure to use.
No. This service organizes the dates, descriptions, and figures the form requires; the investor's CPA or tax preparer completes and files the actual return.
Each replacement property generally needs its own description and figures on the return, so the preparation package separates them clearly rather than combining them into a single line item.
The DST interest is treated as its own replacement property for reporting purposes, with its own acquisition date and basis figures, and the sponsor's closing documentation feeds that portion of the package.
Ideally throughout the exchange as documents become available, rather than compiled from scratch after the replacement closing, since some figures are easier to source while the transaction is still recent.
The investor's CPA or tax advisor determines the final tax treatment of any recognized gain; this service surfaces the boot worksheet figures for that review rather than making the determination itself.
Where the exchange involved a DST allocation, the sponsor's subscription confirmation and any distribution statements issued before year-end should be added to this list as well, since those figures feed the same return alongside any directly owned replacement property.
View All Service Areas