A reverse exchange flips the usual sequence: the replacement property closes before the relinquished property sells, which matters in a market where a strong Park City candidate can disappear before a California relinquished property finds a buyer. The structure adds a parking arrangement that has to be documented correctly from day one or the exchange does not hold up. Getting that documentation right at the start is what makes the rest of the coordination straightforward, and it is far cheaper to set up properly than to fix midstream.
This structure gets considered when a replacement candidate, a Main Street retail building or a Kimball Junction net lease pad, comes to market on a timeline faster than the relinquished property is expected to sell. Rather than risk losing the candidate, the replacement is purchased first and held by an accommodation party until the relinquished property closes.
A reverse structure adds cost and complexity, so it is generally reserved for a candidate the investor considers genuinely difficult to replace, not used as a default approach for every acquisition. That cost is weighed against the risk of losing the candidate altogether before the decision is made.
The exchange accommodation titleholder, often called the EAT, takes title to either the replacement or the relinquished property and holds it during the parking period. Its scope of work is narrow and specific:
Selecting an EAT with commercial property experience matters here, since the management agreement for a Park City building carries different obligations than one written for a single-family rental, particularly around seasonal maintenance and vendor contracts.
It is typically used when a strong replacement candidate becomes available faster than the relinquished property is expected to sell, which is common when a desirable Park City-area building comes to market on a competitive timeline.
It is the party that takes and holds legal title to either the replacement or relinquished property during the parking period, under a qualified exchange accommodation agreement, while the investor retains the economic benefits of ownership.
The same one-hundred-eighty-day period applies, but it runs from when the parking arrangement begins rather than from a relinquished property sale, since in a reverse structure the replacement property closing comes first.
It can, but not every lender is set up to lend to an accommodation titleholder instead of the investor directly, so financing terms need to be confirmed before the parked property closes rather than assumed to work like a standard purchase loan.
A qualified exchange accommodation agreement has to be in place before the replacement property closes, along with records showing the titleholder holds legal title while the investor keeps the economic obligations of ownership throughout the parking period. Those records are maintained continuously rather than assembled only when the structure is unwound, and gaps in that record are the most common source of trouble if the structure is ever questioned.
The parking arrangement is not a handshake; it requires a qualified exchange accommodation agreement in place before the replacement property closes, along with clear records showing the EAT holds legal title while the investor retains the economic benefits and obligations of ownership. That documentation is what an examiner would look for if the structure were ever questioned.
Every management decision made during the parking period is logged as part of this record, since a gap in that log is exactly what could call the structure into question later, and a thin file is far harder to defend than a complete one, regardless of how the underlying transaction actually played out.
View All Service Areas